The homebuyers association claimed that the huge twin towers constructed by the builder were not in the original plan shown to them at the time of booking and they had blocked their view, fresh air and sunlight. The builder said that out of 633 people booking the flats initially, 133 moved out to other projects, 248 had taken refunds and 252 home buyers still had their bookings with the company on the project. Supertech had argued that the Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association was not even in existence when the plan was sanctioned and construction had begun. Realty firm Supertech Ltd had defended the construction of the twin towers at Emerald Court and claimed no illegality. The Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association argued that the flat owners were not part of the initial plan shown to the home buyers.Īlso Read | Relief to homebuyers as Supreme Court cancels Amrapali's registration The residents of the Supertech Emerald Court had moved the Allahabad High Court challenging the construction of the two new towers. The Supreme Court bench also observed that "availability of housing stock, especially in metropolitan cities, is necessary to accommodate the constant influx of people” and that “it has to be balanced with two crucial considerations - the protection of the environment and the well-being and safety of those who occupy these constructions”. A criminal action against Supertech and Noida officials under the UP Apartments Act and UPAID will be initiated.Emerald Court RWA (Residents’ Welfare Association) will get Rs 2 crore as compensation.The flat buyers will be repaid the entire amount paid so far plus 12 per cent interest from date of deposit - 4 categories of buyers identified.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |